Search for: All records

Weak supervision (WS) is a popular approach for label-efficient learning, leveraging diverse sources of noisy but inexpensive weak labels to automatically annotate training data. Despite its wide usage, WS and its practical value are challenging to benchmark due to the many knobs in its setup, including: data sources, labeling functions (LFs), aggregation techniques (called label models), and end model pipelines. Existing evaluation suites tend to be limited, focusing on particular components or specialized use cases. Moreover, they often involve simplistic benchmark tasks or de-facto LF sets that are suboptimally written, producing insights that may not generalize to real-world settings. We address these limitations by introducing a new benchmark, BOXWRENCH, designed to more accurately reflect real-world usages of WS. This benchmark features tasks with (1) higher class cardinality and imbalance, (2) notable domain expertise requirements, and (3) opportunities to re-use LFs across parallel multilingual corpora. For all tasks, LFs are written using a careful procedure aimed at mimicking real-world settings. In contrast to existing WS benchmarks, we show that supervised learning requires substantial amounts (1000+) of labeled examples to match WS in many settings. 

The authors introduce DataComp for Language Models (DCLM), a testbed for controlled dataset experiments aimed at improving language models. DCLM provides a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations. Participants can experiment with dataset curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing at model scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters. As a baseline, the authors find that model-based filtering is critical for assembling a high-quality training set. Their resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter model from scratch to achieve 64% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2.6T training tokens. This represents a 6.6 percentage point improvement over MAP-Neo (the previous state-of-the-art in open-data LMs), while using 40% less compute. The baseline model is also comparable to Mistral-7B-v0.3 and Llama 3 8B on MMLU (63% and 66%), and performs similarly on an average of 53 NLU tasks, while using 6.6x less compute than Llama 3 8B. These findings emphasize the importance of dataset design for training LMs and establish a foundation for further research on data curation. 

The emergence of machine learning as a society-changing technology in the past decade has triggered concerns about people's inability to understand the reasoning of increasingly complex models. The field of IML (interpretable machine learning) grew out of these concerns, with the goal of empowering various stakeholders to tackle use cases, such as building trust in models, performing model debugging, and generally informing real human decision-making.